Oh philosophy! There will be no more sorrow or forgetfulness: A reply to Carlos Montemayor's "Rationality and reasonableness in legal theory"
Fiche du document
1 décembre 2015
- handle: 10670/1.h5lt0l
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
Mots-clés
Analytical philosophy Jurisprudential Methodology Normativism Naturalism Dialog between Traditions Bridges among DisciplinesSujets proches
Knowledge--Philosophy Mental philosophyCiter ce document
Guillermo Lariguet, « Oh philosophy! There will be no more sorrow or forgetfulness: A reply to Carlos Montemayor's "Rationality and reasonableness in legal theory" », Problema anuario de filosofía y teoría del derecho, ID : 10670/1.h5lt0l
Métriques
Partage / Export
Résumé
In this paper I reply to Carlos Montemayor's Rationality And Reasonableness In Legal Theory. My claim is that in philosophy in general -but also in legal philosophy in particular- there is a certain manner of understanding the analytical approach that reproduces a theoretical isolation which I find open to criticism for the many reasons I outline in the text. Additionally, I explain the way in which the phrase "legal philosophy reloaded" used in a recent article of mine is a normative one. I then distinguish between two versions of naturalism and claim for a weak version in the context of a defense of conceptual analysis.