Fiche du document
2010
- handle: 10670/1.ibcnjx
- Gargouri, Y.; Hajjem, C.; Larivière, V.; Gingras, Y.; Brody, T.; Carr, L. et Harnad, Stevan (2010). « Self-Selected or Mandated, Open Access Increases Citation Impact for Higher Quality Research ». PLOS ONE, 5(10).
Ce document est lié à :
http://archipel.uqam.ca/6560/
Ce document est lié à :
http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/268493/58/MandateOA_PLO [...]
Sujets proches
WritersCiter ce document
Y. Gargouri et al., « Self-Selected or Mandated, Open Access Increases Citation Impact for Higher Quality Research », UQAM Archipel : articles scientifiques, ID : 10670/1.ibcnjx
Métriques
Partage / Export
Résumé
Articles whose authors make them Open Access (OA) by self-archiving them online are cited significantly more than articles accessible only to subscribers. Some have suggested that this "OA Advantage" may not be causal but just a self-selection bias, because authors preferentially make higher-quality articles OA. To test this we compared self-selective self-archiving with mandatory self-archiving for a sample of 27,197 articles published 2002-2006 in 1,984 journals. The OA Advantage proved just as high for both. Logistic regression showed that the advantage is independent of other correlates of citations (article age; journal impact factor; number of co-authors, references or pages; field; article type; country or institution) and greatest for the most highly cited articles. The OA Advantage is real, independent and causal, but skewed. Its size is indeed correlated with quality, just as citations themselves are (the top 20% of articles receive about 80% of all citations). The advantage is greater for the more citeable articles, not because of a quality bias from authors self-selecting what to make OA, but because of a quality advantage, from users self-selecting what to use and cite, freed by OA from the constraints of selective accessibility to subscribers only. [See accompanying RTF file for responses to feedback. Four PDF files provide Supplementary Analysis.]