What drives the acceptability of restrictive health policies: An experimental assessment of individual preferences for anti-COVID 19 strategies
Fiche du document
- handle: 10670/1.ixsqrr
- hal: hal-03866196
- doi: 10.1016/j.econmod.2022.106047
- WOS: 000864647500005
Ce document est lié à :
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1016/j.econmod.2022.106047
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/ , info:eu-repo/semantics/OpenAccess
Mots-clés
Policy design Discrete choice experiment Individual preferences Acceptability C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods/C.C9 - Design of Experiments/C.C9.C90 - General D - Microeconomics/D.D9 - Intertemporal Choice/D.D9.D90 - General I - Health, Education, and Welfare/I.I1 - Health/I.I1.I18 - Government Policy • Regulation • Public Health -bio]/Santé publique et épidémiologieSujets proches
Populations, Human Human populations Population growth Human population Demography DemographicsCiter ce document
Thierry Blayac et al., « What drives the acceptability of restrictive health policies: An experimental assessment of individual preferences for anti-COVID 19 strategies », HAL-SHS : économie et finance, ID : 10.1016/j.econmod.2022.106047
Métriques
Partage / Export
Résumé
The public acceptability of a policy is an important issue in democracies, in particular for anti-COVID-19 policies, which require the adherence of the population to be applicable and efficient. Discrete choice experiment (DCE) can help elicit preference ranking among various policies for the whole population and subgroups. Using a representative sample of the French population, we apply DCE methods to assess the acceptability of various anti-COVID-19 measures, separately and as a package. Owing to the methods, we determine the extent to which acceptability depends on personal characteristics: political orientation, health vulnerability, or age. The young population differs in terms of policy preferences and their claim for monetary compensation, suggesting a tailored policy for them. The paper provides key methodological tools based on microeconomic evaluation of individuals’ preferences for improving the design of public health policies.