Household preferences for reducing greenhouse gas emissions in four European high-income countries: Does health information matter? A mixed-methods study protocol
Fiche du document
décembre 2018
- handle: 10670/1.j5nwsa
- hal: hal-01693772
- doi: 10.1186/s12889-017-4604-1
- PUBMEDCENTRAL: PMC5540303
Ce document est lié à :
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1186/s12889-017-4604-1
Sujets proches
Measures Wellness Personal health Biography--HealthCiter ce document
Alina Herrmann et al., « Household preferences for reducing greenhouse gas emissions in four European high-income countries: Does health information matter? A mixed-methods study protocol », HALSHS : archive ouverte en Sciences de l’Homme et de la Société, ID : 10.1186/s12889-017-4604-1
Métriques
Partage / Export
Résumé
It is now universally acknowledged that climate change constitutes a major threat to human health. At the same time, some of the measures to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, so-called climate change mitigation measures, have significant health co-benefits (e.g., walking or cycling more; eating less meat). The goal of limiting global warming to 1,5° Celsius set by the Conference of the Parties to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change in Paris in 2015 can only be reached if all stakeholders, including households, take actions to mitigate climate change. Results on whether framing mitigation measures in terms of their health co-benefits increases the likelihood of their implementation are inconsistent. The present study protocol describes the transdisciplinary project HOPE (HOuseholds’ Preferences for reducing greenhouse gas emissions in four European high-income countries) that investigates the role of health co-benefits in households’ decision making on climate change mitigation measures in urban households in France, Germany, Norway and Sweden.