Wrestling with the Shadow: The Panlogism Controversy in Hegel's French Reception (1897-1927)

Fiche du document

Auteur
Date

13 novembre 2018

Discipline
Type de document
Périmètre
Langue
Identifiants
Relations

Ce document est lié à :
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1017/S147924431800046X

Collection

Archives ouvertes


Sujets proches En

Article

Citer ce document

Pietro Terzi, « Wrestling with the Shadow: The Panlogism Controversy in Hegel's French Reception (1897-1927) », HAL-SHS : philosophie, ID : 10.1017/S147924431800046X


Métriques


Partage / Export

Résumé En

This article widens the scope of the history of Hegel's reception in turn-of-the-century French philosophy by thematizing an often neglected moment, namely the years 1897 to 1927. Before the so-called “Hegel renaissance,” in fact, the Hegelian dialectics was generally understood as a “panlogist” doctrine aimed at dissolving the concrete individual in the abstract dimension of the concept or in the all-encompassing realm of Absolute Spirit. However, even at the beginning of the century, attempts were made to provide a more positive assessment of Hegelian philosophy. The author reconstructs this panlogist controversy by analyzing the points of view of some prominent philosophers of the time, namely Charles Renouvier, René Berthelot, Émile Boutroux, Émile Meyerson and Léon Brunschvicg. The aim of the article is to provide a deeper understanding of the historical continuities and discontinuities characterizing Hegel's reception in France.

document thumbnail

Par les mêmes auteurs

Sur les mêmes sujets

Sur les mêmes disciplines

Exporter en