Escala de estratégias metacognitivas de leitura para universitários brasileiros: estudo de validade divergente
Fiche du document
2007
- handle: 10670/1.k39mon
- 1657-9267
Ce document est lié à :
http://www.redalyc.org/revista.oa
Universitas Psychologica
Sujets proches
Reading--Study and teaching Competence AssessmentCiter ce document
Maria Cristina Rodrigues Azevedo Joly, « Escala de estratégias metacognitivas de leitura para universitários brasileiros: estudo de validade divergente », Universitas Psychologica, ID : 10670/1.k39mon
Métriques
Partage / Export
Résumé
"This study aimed to identify relationships between problem solving and the use of metacognitive strategies in reading.262 university students, 79% female, took part in this research, with ages between 16 and 53 years, from differentcourses. The instruments were applied all together. The results showed significant correlations between strategies usedafter reading and the performance in the GfRI (Dynamic Evaluation of Fluid Intelligence) post-test1. There were alsosignificant but low correlations between 34.5% of the items from the scale and the GfRI. The groups with the best andthe worst strategies usage frequency, extreme groups, had widely differenced performance in the GfRI post-test1.Discrimination of the extreme groups related to the GfRI, when divided into gender, course, period and whether theyhad morning or night schedules, was evidenced. These results showed evidences of divergent validity for theMetacognitive Reading Strategies Scale."