Fiche du document
2015
- handle: 10670/1.ku0xe6
- doi: 10.3917/dha.hs13.0031
Copyright PERSEE 2003-2023. Works reproduced on the PERSEE website are protected by the general rules of the Code of Intellectual Property. For strictly private, scientific or teaching purposes excluding all commercial use, reproduction and communication to the public of this document is permitted on condition that its origin and copyright are clearly mentionned.
Citer ce document
Cécile Daude, « Iudicia : jugements de valeur dans les scholies aux Olympiques », Dialogues d'histoire ancienne, ID : 10.3917/dha.hs13.0031
Métriques
Partage / Export
Résumé
« Iudicia : judgments of value in the scholia to Olympian Odes » Through the study of praise and blame terms in the scholia, we may see more precisely the finality of the commentaries : far from aiming at amending Pindar’s poetical language, the commentators try to make it easier of access and understanding. They have the clear feeling of the specificity and polysemia of the text. The normative remarks relative to grammar, syntax or style concern, not Pindar himself, but the students or well-read men to whom are intended the commentaries : these people, as they initiate themselves to Pindar’s poetics, must learn more deeply the good use of their language.