Conclusion: A Kaleidoscope of Administrative Reforms in Europe

Fiche du document

Discipline
Périmètre
Langue
Identifiants
Relations

Ce document est lié à :
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/hdl/2441/4i7rfup8th90oa9attldhkuh6r

Organisation

Sciences Po



Citer ce document

Rhys Andrews et al., « Conclusion: A Kaleidoscope of Administrative Reforms in Europe », Archive ouverte de Sciences Po (SPIRE), ID : 10670/1.m72euv


Métriques


Partage / Export

Résumé 0

This chapter discusses the lessons that can be drawn from the findings presented in the book and outlines a future research agenda for European comparative public administration. The evidence on the salience of different reform paradigms in European central governments is summarised, along with the broad patterns of convergence and divergence in reform trends across Europe. Suggestions for more detailed analyses that can build on the research presented in the book are then made. The main lessons from the book are that: (a) between 2008 and 2013 most public management reforms were of a neo-Weberian/New Public Governance (NPG) type focused on transparency, collaboration and e-government; (b) important cross-country variations in the interpretation and implementation of public management reforms still persist; and, (c) future research should focus more closely on the influence of administrative and political cultures on the causes and consequences of management reforms.

document thumbnail

Par les mêmes auteurs

Sur les mêmes sujets

Sur les mêmes disciplines

Exporter en