Comparison Of Two Systems Designed To Measure Vertical Jump Height

Fiche du document

Date

2014

Type de document
Périmètre
Langue
Identifiants
Relations

Ce document est lié à :
http://www.redalyc.org/revista.oa

Licence

RICYDE. Revista Internacional de Ciencias del Deporte




Citer ce document

Alejandro Santos-Lozano et al., « Comparison Of Two Systems Designed To Measure Vertical Jump Height », RICYDE. Revista Internacional de Ciencias del Deporte, ID : 10670/1.mfc76b


Métriques


Partage / Export

Résumé 0

"The vertical jump height is commonly employed to assess indirectly the lower body strength and power. Traditional methods to assess the vertical jump height are been replaced by new emerging technologies as optical mat platform. The aim of the present study was checked the agreement between one traditional contact mat (Globus Ergo Tester) and an optical mat (Optojump System), and to investigate the interchangeability of this 2 commercial systems estimating vertical jump in dif- ferent types of jump (Squat Jump, Counter Movement Jump and Abalakov). Significantly differen- ces between methods in each jump condition were reported, high Inter-class Correlation Coefficients values (ranged between 0.972 to 0.990) were found between methods in each jump condition and the coefficient of variation values were ranged from 6.18 to 7.32. T-test revealed sig- nificantly differences between the limits of agreement at 95% in all jumps between methods jump heights. The results of this study show that the Optojump, as optical mat, reported lower values than the Globus Ergo Tester, a contact mat. There are evidences that Optojump and Globus Ergo Tester are not interchangeably."

document thumbnail

Par les mêmes auteurs

Sur les mêmes sujets

Exporter en