Fiche du document
14 avril 2021
- handle: 10670/1.muraav
- hal: hal-04056051
- doi: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199395699.013.21
Ce document est lié à :
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199395699.013.21
Sujets proches
Knowledge--Philosophy Voyages and travels--Views Geography--Views Natural scenery Scenery Conviction Science, Mental Mental philosophy Mind Behavioral sciences Mental philosophy Life--Philosophy Moral philosophy Science, Moral Morals Ethics, Primitive Philosophy, Moral Morality Deontology Ethology Beton Community Biography--Psychology Personality Biography--Character Moral ideas Religion and ethics Biography--Character Knowledge--Ethics vérité (concept) moraleCiter ce document
Claudine Tiercelin, « James and Peirce », HAL-SHS : philosophie, ID : 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199395699.013.21
Métriques
Partage / Export
Résumé
After presenting some parallels between James and Peirce, as regards their views on psychology, truth, ethics, and even realism, some differences between both philosophers are pointed out: whether they favor concrete individuals rather than the community of inquirers, favor life rather than knowledge, take or do not take all aspects of the sceptical challenge seriously, and are committed or not committed to a strong realistic (rather than nominalistic) metaphysics. Such differences, or even oppositions, may have more to do with what they took as decisive in philosophy and, more generally, with their respective conceptions of our ethical priorities.