Descartes’s Conception of Mind Through the Prism of Imagination: Cartesian Substance Dualism Questioned

Fiche du document

Date

5 juin 2018

Discipline
Type de document
Périmètre
Langue
Identifiants
Relations

Ce document est lié à :
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1515/agph-2018-2002

Collection

Archives ouvertes



Citer ce document

Lynda Gaudemard, « Descartes’s Conception of Mind Through the Prism of Imagination: Cartesian Substance Dualism Questioned », HAL-SHS : philosophie, ID : 10.1515/agph-2018-2002


Métriques


Partage / Export

Résumé En

: The aim of this article is to clarify an aspect of Descartes’s conception of mind that seriously impacts on the standard objections against Cartesian Dualism. By a close reading of Descartes’s writings on imagination, I argue that the capacity to imagine does not inhere as a mode in the mind itself, but only in the embodied mind, that is, a mind that is not united to the body does not possess the faculty to imagine. As a mode considered as a general property, and not as an instance of it, belongs to the essence of the substance, and as imagination (like sensation) arises from the mind-body union, then the problem arises of knowing to what extent a Cartesian embodied mind is separable from the body.

document thumbnail

Par les mêmes auteurs

Sur les mêmes sujets

Sur les mêmes disciplines

Exporter en