Fiche du document
2022
- handle: 10670/1.n1ya1e
- halshs: halshs-03263245
- doi: 10.1080/00343404.2021.1922662
Ce document est lié à :
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1080/00343404.2021.1922662
Mots-clés
well-being sustainability urban and rural territories alternative indicators public policy actions C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods/C.C1 - Econometric and Statistical Methods and Methodology: General I - Health, Education, and Welfare/I.I3 - Welfare, Well-Being, and Poverty/I.I3.I39 - Other R - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics/R.R1 - General Regional Economics/R.R1.R10 - General R - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics/R.R5 - Regional Government Analysis/R.R5.R58 - Regional Development Planning and PolicySujets proches
Welfare (Personal well-being) WellbeingCiter ce document
Anne Le Roy et al., « The sustainable well-being of urban and rural areas », HAL-SHS : économie et finance, ID : 10.1080/00343404.2021.1922662
Métriques
Partage / Export
Résumé
Are well-being and sustainability ‘territorially differentiated realities’? This article draws on an experiment to develop sustainable territorial well-being indicators in the French urban area of Grenoble. Our discussion is based on a cross-sectional and longitudinal analysis of survey data produced in 2012 and 2018. From the interpretation of these indicators, we highlight the importance of taking account of territorial specificities in the deployment of sustainable well-being policies. Subsequently, our interest lies in the move to action: How should differentiation be approached in terms not only of observation but also of actions?