The influence of verbal mood in exceptive conditional reasoning: Indicative versus subjunctive

Fiche du document

Date

2015

Discipline
Type de document
Périmètre
Langue
Identifiants
Source

Psicothema

Relations

Ce document est lié à :
http://www.redalyc.org/revista.oa

Licence

Psicothema



Sujets proches En

Argumentation Ratiocination

Citer ce document

Orlando Espino et al., « The influence of verbal mood in exceptive conditional reasoning: Indicative versus subjunctive », Psicothema, ID : 10670/1.ncm252


Métriques


Partage / Export

Résumé 0

"Background: We report the results of two experiments that examine the mental representations underlying the comprehension and reasoning stages of negative exceptive conditionals requiring the subjunctive (‘B a menos que A’ and ‘B a no ser que A’ = ‘B unless A’) and the indicative mood (‘B excepto si A’ and ‘B salvo si A’ = ‘B except if A’). Method: A truth table task was employed to infer the mental representation that people have in mind when they reason with negative exceptive conditionals. Results: Both experiments showed that participants selected the possibility ‘B & not-A’ more frequently than the possibility ‘not-B & A’ when the conditional required the indicative mood, but they selected the possibilities ‘B & not-A’ and ‘not-B & A’ equally frequently when the conditional required the subjunctive mood. Conclusions: Exceptive conditionals in the subjunctive mood lead people to think in terms of dual possibilities, whereas the indicative mood leads people to consider just one possibility."

document thumbnail

Par les mêmes auteurs

Sur les mêmes sujets

Sur les mêmes disciplines

Exporter en