Fiche du document
- handle: 10670/1.nj7xbp
- halshs: halshs-02297689
- doi: 10.1093/erae/jbz021
- WOS: 000493390200005
Ce document est lié à :
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1093/erae/jbz021
Mots-clés
Policy design Field experiments Common agricultural policy Impact evaluation C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods/C.C9 - Design of Experiments/C.C9.C93 - Field Experiments Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics • Environmental and Ecological Economics/Q.Q1 - Agriculture/Q.Q1.Q18 - Agricultural Policy • Food PolicySujets proches
State trials Field crops--Field experiments Crops--Field experiments Field plot technique Field tests Agriculture--Field experiments Field trials in agricultureCiter ce document
Luc Behaghel et al., « How can randomised controlled trials help improve the design of the common agricultural policy? », HAL-SHS : économie et finance, ID : 10.1093/erae/jbz021
Métriques
Partage / Export
Résumé
We illustrate how randomised controlled trials (RCTs) could be used to evaluate the impact of alternative designs of the common agricultural policy (CAP). We select four policy-design issues which relate to different components of the CAP and raise a wide range of economic questions: nudges, coordination failures, equity-efficiency trade-offs, contract design. Based on examples from agricultural and social policies in developing and developed countries, we show that RCTs have provided useful rigorous evidence on similar design issues, suggesting that they could also be leveraged to help improve components of the CAP.