Dual Iconographies And Legitimation Practices In Contemporary Organizations: A Tale Of The Former Nato Command Room
Fiche du document
- handle: 10670/1.nqhcvz
- hal: hal-01644981
- doi: 10.1057/9781137432124.0007
Ce document est lié à :
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1057/9781137432124.0007
Mots-clés
Pratiques de légitimation Organisation du traité de l'Atlantique nord (OTAN) Legitimation practices North Atlantic treaty organization (NATO) H - Public Economics/H.H7 - State and Local Government • Intergovernmental Relations/H.H7.H77 - Intergovernmental Relations • Federalism • Secession L - Industrial Organization/L.L3 - Nonprofit Organizations and Public Enterprise/L.L3.L39 - Other M - Business Administration and Business Economics • Marketing • Accounting • Personnel Economics/M.M1 - Business Administration/M.M1.M19 - OtherSujets proches
Organisation Case Voluntary organizations Networks (Associations, institutions, etc.) Organizations Voluntary associations Institutions, associations, etcCiter ce document
François-Xavier de Vaujany et al., « Dual Iconographies And Legitimation Practices In Contemporary Organizations: A Tale Of The Former Nato Command Room », HAL-SHS : droit et gestion, ID : 10.1057/9781137432124.0007
Métriques
Partage / Export
Résumé
In this chapter, the authors propose a theoretical lens to critically examine the iconographies of contemporary organizations. In doing so, they seek to understand how iconographies can be used to legitimize organizations. They distinguish between two iconographies – ‘image-object’ and ‘screen-object’ – and examine how they are intricately related to organizational legitimation practices. They then go on to illustrate these iconographies and their relationships in the case study of a French university that has faced intense and changing legitimacy demands. The authors investigate the relationships between these iconographies in the extreme case of the command room of the former North American Treaty Organization (NATO), as the university in question occupies the former NATO headquarters. The case study reveals how university members shifted between iconographies of ‘image-object’ and ‘screen-objects’ to legitimize their organizing practices. As a conclusion, implications for debates about sociomateriality and its relationship with organizational legitimacy are discussed.