Can we trust Einstein’s accounts of the genesis of special relativity?

Fiche du document

Date

2021

Type de document
Périmètre
Langue
Identifiants
Relations

Ce document est lié à :
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1016/j.shpsa.2021.04.005

Collection

Archives ouvertes

Licence

info:eu-repo/semantics/OpenAccess



Sujets proches En

Relativism

Citer ce document

Olivier Darrigol, « Can we trust Einstein’s accounts of the genesis of special relativity? », HAL-SHS : histoire, philosophie et sociologie des sciences et des techniques, ID : 10.1016/j.shpsa.2021.04.005


Métriques


Partage / Export

Résumé En

There are three kinds of sources available to reconstruct the reflections that led Einstein to special relativity: a few contemporary letters and documents, his impersonal accounts of the genesis of this theory, and recollections of his own path. At first glance, contradictions within and between these sources hamper the reliability of Einstein’s accounts. Yet, a closer analysis reveals much more consistency than foreseen and helps eliminate the dubious, contradictory elements. It then becomes possible to combine the three kinds of sources to produce a minimally speculative and yet fairly coherent account of the genesis of special relativity.

document thumbnail

Par les mêmes auteurs

Sur les mêmes sujets

Sur les mêmes disciplines

Exporter en