Voice mismatch in Right Node Raising: Evidence from acceptability judgments and an eyetracking reading experiment

Fiche du document

Date

2016

Discipline
Type de document
Périmètre
Langue
Identifiants
Collection

Archives ouvertes


Mots-clés En

linguistics

Sujets proches En

Speaking

Citer ce document

Aoi Shirashi et al., « Voice mismatch in Right Node Raising: Evidence from acceptability judgments and an eyetracking reading experiment », HAL-SHS : linguistique, ID : 10670/1.ooi214


Métriques


Partage / Export

Résumé En

Voice mismatches may arise in VP ellipsis and Pseudogapping between source and target. No such mismatch has been reported for Right Node Raising (RNR). However, French corpora provide many examples, where the shared participle must be interpreted as active (reflexive) and passive. Since RNR requires semantic contrast between the conjuncts, we conducted two experiments to test semantic (agent) contrast and syntactic (voice) match:  +contrast/-match: Ce pharmacien doit des explications à ceux qui se sont *ou qui ont été* mobilisés pour lui. / This pharmacist owes explanations to those who themselves have or who have been mobilized for him.  -contrast/-match: qu'on a *ou qui ont été* / who one has or who have been  +contrast/+match: qui se sont *ou qu'on a* / who themselves have or who one has  -contrast/+match: qui étaient *ou qui ont été* / who were or who have been  Acceptability judgements only showed a significant effect of contrast (p

document thumbnail

Par les mêmes auteurs

Sur les mêmes sujets

Sur les mêmes disciplines

Exporter en