Fiche du document
2019
- handle: 10670/1.ref8ke
- hal: hal-03318921
- doi: 10.12688/f1000research.19994.2
Ce document est lié à :
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.12688/f1000research.19994.2
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/ , info:eu-repo/semantics/OpenAccess
Mots-clés
Scientific Software Research Software Research Software Citation Research Software Evaluation Open Science Research evaluationSujets proches
Scientific research Science research Science--ResearchCiter ce document
Teresa Gomez-Diaz et al., « On the evaluation of research software: the CDUR procedure », HAL-SHS : sciences de l'information, de la communication et des bibliothèques, ID : 10.12688/f1000research.19994.2
Métriques
Partage / Export
Résumé
Background: Evaluation of the quality of research software is a challenging and relevant issue, still not sufficiently addressed by thescientific community.Methods: Our contribution begins by defining, precisely but widely enough, the notions of research software and of its authors followed by a study of the evaluation issues, as the basis for the proposition of a sound assessment protocol: the CDUR procedure.Results: CDUR comprises four steps introduced as follows: Citation, to deal with correct RS identification, Dissemination, to measure good dissemination practices, Use, devoted to the evaluation of usability aspects, and Research, to assess the impact of the scientific work.Conclusions: Some conclusions and recommendations are finally included. The evaluation of research is the keystone to boost theevolution of the Open Science policies and practices. It is as well our belief that research software evaluation is a fundamental step to induce better research software practices and, thus, a step towards more efficient science.