Are the Bundle Theory and the Substratum Theory Really Twin Brothers?

Fiche du document

Auteur
Date

2013

Type de document
Périmètre
Langue
Identifiants
Source

HAL-SHS : histoire, philosophie et sociologie des sciences et des techniques

Relations

Ce document est lié à :
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1007/s10516-008-9053-0

Collection

Archives ouvertes

Organisation

Centre pour la communication scientifique directe

Mots-clés En

Bare particular Substratum Compresence Ontology Equivalence Property Identity Individuation Haecceitism Identity of the Indiscernibles Perdurantism Endurantism

Sujets proches En

Identity

Citer ce document

Matteo Morganti, « Are the Bundle Theory and the Substratum Theory Really Twin Brothers? », HAL-SHS : histoire, philosophie et sociologie des sciences et des techniques, ID : 10.1007/s10516-008-9053-0

Métriques

Partage / Export

Résumé En

In a recent paper, Jiri Benovsky argues that the bundle theory and the substratum theory, traditionally regarded as 'deadly enemies' in the metaphysics literature, are in fact 'twin brothers'. That is, they turn out to be 'equivalent for all theoretical purposes' upon analysis. The only exception, according to Benovsky, is a particular version of the bundle theory whose distinguishing features render unappealing. In the present reply article, I critically analyse these undoubtedly relevant claims, and reject them.

document thumbnail

Par les mêmes auteurs

Sur les mêmes sujets

Exporter en