The divergent governance of gene editing in agriculture: a comparison of institutional reports from seven EU member states

Fiche du document

Date

16 octobre 2019

Discipline
Type de document
Périmètre
Langue
Identifiants
Collection

Archives ouvertes




Citer ce document

Morgan Meyer et al., « The divergent governance of gene editing in agriculture: a comparison of institutional reports from seven EU member states », HAL-SHS : sciences politiques, ID : 10670/1.sgbb8u


Métriques


Partage / Export

Résumé En

How have national institutions and committees from EU member states positioned themselves regarding the use of gene editing in agriculture? To answer this question, this article examines and compares 11 official reports and position statements from 7 European countries: Germany, France, the Netherlands, Italy, Spain, Denmark, and Sweden. The various kinds of issues that are addressed and arguments that are made in the reports are coded into large categories (innovation, risk, ethics, legislation, etc.) and are analyzed. The paper discusses the main similarities and differences in terms of how the governance of gene editing is problematized. In doing so, the paper aims to provide a useful resource to broaden debates on the future regulation of gene editing within and beyond Europe.

document thumbnail

Par les mêmes auteurs

Sur les mêmes sujets

Sur les mêmes disciplines

Exporter en