Shareability of Thought and Frege's Constraint: A Reply to Onofri

Fiche du document

Auteur
Date

2022

Discipline
Type de document
Périmètre
Langue
Identifiants
Source

HAL-SHS : philosophie

Relations

Ce document est lié à :
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1080/0020174X.2022.2034526

Collection

Archives ouvertes

Organisation

Centre pour la communication scientifique directe

Licence

info:eu-repo/semantics/OpenAccess

Mots-clés En

Content Frege's Constraint Communication Frege cases Coreference Relationism Philosophy of language

Sujets proches En

Thinking Thoughts Mind

Citer ce document

Romain Bourdoncle, « Shareability of Thought and Frege's Constraint: A Reply to Onofri », HAL-SHS : philosophie, ID : 10.1080/0020174X.2022.2034526

Métriques

Partage / Export

Résumé En

Onofri (2018) proposes an individuation criterion for thoughts that purports to satisfy both shareability (the notion that different thinkers, or a single thinker at different times, can and generally do think type-identical thoughts) and Frege's constraint (according to which two thoughts are different if it is possible for a rational subject to endorse one while rejecting the other). I argue that his proposal fails to satisfy Frege's constraint. Then I propose a modification to Onofri's proposal to fix the problem.

document thumbnail

Par les mêmes auteurs

Sur les mêmes sujets

Sur les mêmes disciplines

Exporter en