Richer or Poorer? Marriage as an Anti-Poverty Strategy in the United States

Fiche du document

Date

2002

Discipline
Type de document
Périmètre
Langue
Identifiants
Source

Population

Collection

Persée

Organisation

MESR

Licence

Copyright PERSEE 2003-2023. Works reproduced on the PERSEE website are protected by the general rules of the Code of Intellectual Property. For strictly private, scientific or teaching purposes excluding all commercial use, reproduction and communication to the public of this document is permitted on condition that its origin and copyright are clearly mentionned.



Citer ce document

Wendy Sigle-Rushton et al., « Richer or Poorer? Marriage as an Anti-Poverty Strategy in the United States », Population, ID : 10.2307/3246637


Métriques


Partage / Export

Résumé En Fr Es

SiGLE-RusHTON Wendy, McLanahan Sara.- For Richer or Poorer? Marriage as an Anti- Poverty Strategy in the United States Many conservative politicians in the United States are suggesting that although, as a result of sweeping reforms, states have been successful at moving welfare mothers into paid employment, they have paid too little attention to an integral anti-poverty strategy — encouraging the formation of two-parent families. Comparing the incomes of single mother families to two- parent families, they argue that marriage would reduce poverty. Using data from the Fragile Families and Child Well-being Study, we show that comparing married and single parent families results in substantial overstatement of the economic gains to marriage. We demonstrate that unmarried mothers and their partners are vastly different from married parents when it comes to age, education, health status and behaviour, employment, and wage rates. These differences translate into important differences in earnings capacities, which, in turn, translate into differences in poverty. Even assuming the same family structure and labour supply, our estimates suggest that much of the difference in poverty outcomes by family structure can be attributed to factors other than marital status. Our results also suggest that full employment is essential to lifting poor families — married or otherwise — out of poverty.

SiGLE-RusHTON Wendy, McLanahan Sara.- For Richer or Poorer? Marriage as an Anti- Poverty Strategy in the United States Many conservative politicians in the United States are suggesting that although, as a result of sweeping reforms, states have been successful at moving welfare mothers into paid employment, they have paid too little attention to an integral anti-poverty strategy — encouraging the formation of two-parent families. Comparing the incomes of single mother families to two- parent families, they argue that marriage would reduce poverty. Using data from the Fragile Families and Child Well-being Study, we show that comparing married and single parent families results in substantial overstatement of the economic gains to marriage. We demonstrate that unmarried mothers and their partners are vastly different from married parents when it comes to age, education, health status and behaviour, employment, and wage rates. These differences translate into important differences in earnings capacities, which, in turn, translate into differences in poverty. Even assuming the same family structure and labour supply, our estimates suggest that much of the difference in poverty outcomes by family structure can be attributed to factors other than marital status. Our results also suggest that full employment is essential to lifting poor families — married or otherwise — out of poverty.

Sigle-Rushton Wendy, McLanahan Sara.-

document thumbnail

Par les mêmes auteurs

Sur les mêmes sujets

Sur les mêmes disciplines

Exporter en