The Power to Structure : Making Meaning from Metadata Through Ontologies

Fiche du document

Date

2022

Type de document
Périmètre
Langue
Identifiants
Relations

Ce document est lié à :
KULA : Knowledge Creation, Dissemination, and Preservation Studies ; vol. 6 no. 3 (2022)

Collection

Erudit

Organisation

Consortium Érudit

Licence

©, 2022ErinCanning, SusanBrown, SarahRoger, KimberleyMartin




Citer ce document

Erin Canning et al., « The Power to Structure : Making Meaning from Metadata Through Ontologies », KULA: Knowledge Creation, Dissemination, and Preservation Studies, ID : 10.18357/kula.169


Métriques


Partage / Export

Résumé 0

Information systems are developed by people with intent—they are designed to help creators and users tell specific stories with data. Within information systems, the often invisible structures of metadata profoundly impact the meaning that can be derived from that data. The Linked Infrastructure for Networked Cultural Scholarship project (LINCS) helps humanities researchers tell stories by using linked open data to convert humanities datasets into organized, interconnected, machine-processable resources. LINCS provides context for online cultural materials, interlinks them, and grounds them in sources to improve web resources for research. This article describes how the LINCS team is using the shared standards of linked data and especially ontologies—typically unseen yet powerful—to bring meaning mindfully to metadata through structure. The LINCS metadata—comprised of linked open data about cultural artifacts, people, and processes—and the structures that support it must represent multiple, diverse ways of knowing. It needs to enable various means of incorporating contextual data and of telling stories with nuance and context, situated and supported by data structures that reflect and make space for specificities and complexities. As it addresses specificity in each research dataset, LINCS is simultaneously working to balance interoperability, as achieved through a level of generalization, with contextual and domain-specific requirements. The LINCS team’s approach to ontology adoption and use centers on intersectionality, multiplicity, and difference. The question of what meaning the structures being used will bring to the data is as important as what meaning is introduced as a result of linking data together, and the project has built this premise into its decision-making and implementation processes. To convey an understanding of categories and classification as contextually embedded—culturally produced, intersecting, and discursive—the LINCS team frames them not as fixed but as grounds for investigation and starting points for understanding. Metadata structures are as important as vocabularies for producing such meaning.

document thumbnail

Par les mêmes auteurs

Sur les mêmes sujets

Sur les mêmes disciplines

Exporter en