Fiche du document
11 octobre 2017
- handle: 10670/1.tz9x2f
- hal: hal-03566951
- doi: 10.24187/ecostat.2017.494t.1916
Ce document est lié à :
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.24187/ecostat.2017.494t.1916
info:eu-repo/semantics/OpenAccess
Mots-clés
labour productivity total factor productivity tests for breaks dissemination of innovation ACL-3 E - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics/E.E2 - Consumption, Saving, Production, Investment, Labor Markets, and Informal Economy/E.E2.E22 - Investment • Capital • Intangible Capital • Capacity L - Industrial Organization/L.L1 - Market Structure, Firm Strategy, and Market Performance/L.L1.L11 - Production, Pricing, and Market Structure • Size Distribution of Firms O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth/O.O4 - Economic Growth and Aggregate Productivity/O.O4.O47 - Empirical Studies of Economic Growth • Aggregate Productivity • Cross-Country Output ConvergenceSujets proches
Businesses Firms Companies Enterprises Business organizations Organizations, BusinessCiter ce document
Gilbert Cette et al., « Stagnation of productivity in France: a legacy of the crisis or a structural slowdown? », HAL-SHS : économie et finance, ID : 10.24187/ecostat.2017.494t.1916
Métriques
Partage / Export
Résumé
The productivity slowdown has been analysed either as an effect of the crisis, resulting from the financial and demand shocks, or as a more structural decline. In France, using macroeconomic and microeconomic data, we identify downward breaks in the trends of labour productivity and total factor productivity in the 2000s, several years before the crisis. These breaks result in historically weak rhythms of the trends. Using data on firms located in France, we highlight that, at the technological frontier, productivity has accelerated, especially over the recent period, which contradicts the hypothesis of a decline in innovation. The most productive firms in a given year do not, however, improve their relative advantage. The convergence of firms’ productivity does not seem to have slowed down in the 2000s, which does not confirm the hypothesis of a decrease in the dissemination of innovation. On the other hand, the dispersion of productivity between firms has increased, which suggests increasing difficulties in the reallocation of production factors, labour and capital, between firms.