Fiche du document
12 janvier 2017
- handle: 10670/1.ukgsxv
- isbn: 9783866448568
- eisbn: 9782821874343
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ , info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
Mots-clés
climate engineering geoengineering climate ethics argument map Environmental studies, Geography & Development NAT011000 RNKSujets proches
Justification Faith and justification Justification by faithCiter ce document
Gregor Betz et al., « 3. The Detailed Structure of the Sub-debates », KIT Scientific Publishing, ID : 10670/1.ukgsxv
Métriques
Partage / Export
Résumé
3.1. The Central Justification of R&D The central justification of R&D represents a consequentialist argument. R&D into CE technologies is claimed to be a suitable means for reaching the goal that CE methods be ready for deployment in the future. This argument rests essentially on theses T2 – T4. The argument map below shows the dialectical structure of the central justification of R&D. Argument Map B The central argument in favour of R&D into CE technology T justifies thesis T1 by saying th...