Nonexistence and aboutness: the bandersnatches of Dubuque

Fiche du document

Date

1 janvier 2020

Discipline
Type de document
Périmètre
Langue
Identifiant
Relations

Ce document est lié à :
10.22201/iifs.18704905e.2020.1175

Organisation

SciELO

Licence

info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess




Citer ce document

Stephen Yablo, « Nonexistence and aboutness: the bandersnatches of Dubuque », Crítica (México, D.F.), ID : 10670/1.usuj7h


Métriques


Partage / Export

Résumé 0

Holmes exists is false. How can this be, when there is no one for the sentence to misdescribe? Part of the answer is that a sentence’s topic depends on context. The king of France is bald, normally unevaluable, is false qua description of the bald people. Likewise Holmes exists is false qua description of the things that exist; it misdescribes those things as having Holmes among them. This does not explain, though, how Holmes does not exist differs in cognitive content from, say, Vulcan does not exist. Our answer builds on an observation of Kripke’s: even if Holmes exists, he is not in this room, for we were all born too late.

document thumbnail

Par les mêmes auteurs

Sur les mêmes sujets

Sur les mêmes disciplines

Exporter en