Fiche du document
- handle: 10670/1.uxp767
- hal: hal-02318571
- doi: 10.1007/s11266-018-9951-8
Ce document est lié à :
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1007/s11266-018-9951-8
Mots-clés
Social enterprise South Korea Typology Cooperatives Self-sufficiency J - Labor and Demographic Economics/J.J6 - Mobility, Unemployment, Vacancies, and Immigrant Workers/J.J6.J68 - Public Policy L - Industrial Organization/L.L3 - Nonprofit Organizations and Public Enterprise/L.L3.L31 - Nonprofit Institutions • NGOs • Social Entrepreneurship L - Industrial Organization/L.L3 - Nonprofit Organizations and Public Enterprise/L.L3.L33 - Comparison of Public and Private Enterprises and Nonprofit Institutions • Privatization • Contracting Out M - Business Administration and Business Economics • Marketing • Accounting • Personnel Economics/M.M1 - Business Administration/M.M1.M14 - Corporate Culture • Diversity • Social Responsibility N - Economic History/N.N3 - Labor and Consumers, Demography, Education, Health, Welfare, Income, Wealth, Religion, and Philanthropy/N.N3.N35 - Asia including Middle EastSujets proches
Labor and laboring classes Scientific research Science research Science--Research Nonprofit sector NPOs Not-for-profit organizations Corporations, Nonprofit Non-profits Non-profit sector Non-profit organizations Tax-exempt organizations Nonprofits Organizations, Nonprofit Businesses Firms Companies Enterprises Business organizations Organizations, BusinessCiter ce document
Eric Bidet et al., « Diversity of Social Enterprise Models in South Korea », HAL-SHS : sociologie, ID : 10.1007/s11266-018-9951-8
Métriques
Partage / Export
Résumé
In this paper, we analyse the emergence and development of social enterprise in South Korea. Our purpose is to show how different broad, consensual and successive conceptions of social enterprise—the so-called meta-models—have generated a dynamic and complex environment which includes a variety of models of social enterprise. Based on multiple data sources, including interviews, documents, statistics and field research, we illustrate the diversity of Korean social enterprise models by using the EMES ideal-type as a conceptual framework that leads us to analyse the social, economic and governance dimensions of each type of social enterprise. This research suggests that the social enterprise phenomenon should not be limited to its expressed contents or to an excessively strict legal or economic definition. It eventually contributes to advancing our understanding on social enterprise by showing that the definitions and concepts of social enterprise can be diverse across different social, economic and political contexts. For this reason, building a universal typology that can embrace social enterprises in different national contexts is by far a challenging task.