The path towards herd immunity: Predicting COVID-19 vaccination uptake through results from a stated choice study across six continents

Fiche du document

Type de document
Périmètre
Langue
Identifiants
Relations

Ce document est lié à :
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1016/j.socscimed.2022.114800

Ce document est lié à :
info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/EC/FP7/615596/EU/Choices and consumption: modelling long and short term decisions in a changing world/DECISIONS

Collection

Archives ouvertes

Licences

http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/ , info:eu-repo/semantics/OpenAccess



Citer ce document

Stephane Hess et al., « The path towards herd immunity: Predicting COVID-19 vaccination uptake through results from a stated choice study across six continents », HAL-SHS : économie et finance, ID : 10.1016/j.socscimed.2022.114800


Métriques


Partage / Export

Résumé En

Despite unprecedented progress in developing COVID-19 vaccines, global vaccination levels needed to reach herd immunity remain a distant target, while new variants keep emerging. Obtaining near universal vaccine uptake relies on understanding and addressing vaccine resistance. Simple questions about vaccine acceptance however ignore that the vaccines being offered vary across countries and even population subgroups, and differ in terms of efficacy and side effects. By using advanced discrete choice models estimated on stated choice data collected in 18 countries/territories across six continents, we show a substantial influence of vaccine characteristics. Uptake increases if more efficacious vaccines (95% vs 60%) are offered (mean across study areas = 3.9%, range of 0.6%–8.1%) or if vaccines offer at least 12 months of protection (mean across study areas = 2.4%, range of 0.2%–5.8%), while an increase in severe side effects (from 0.001% to 0.01%) leads to reduced uptake (mean = −1.3%, range of −0.2% to −3.9%). Additionally, a large share of individuals (mean = 55.2%, range of 28%–75.8%) would delay vaccination by 3 months to obtain a more efficacious (95% vs 60%) vaccine, where this increases further if the low efficacy vaccine has a higher risk (0.01% instead of 0.001%) of severe side effects (mean = 65.9%, range of 41.4%–86.5%). Our work highlights that careful consideration of which vaccines to offer can be beneficial. In support of this, we provide an interactive tool to predict uptake in a country as a function of the vaccines being deployed, and also depending on the levels of infectiousness and severity of circulating variants of COVID-19.

document thumbnail

Par les mêmes auteurs

Sur les mêmes sujets

Exporter en