Fiche du document
16 juillet 2021
- handle: 10670/1.wbwj9i
- hal: hal-03877257
- doi: 10.1086/720630
Ce document est lié à :
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1086/720630
Ce document est lié à :
info:eu-repo/grantAgreement//ERC-2017-STG -760037/EU/Firm Growth and Market Power in the Global Economy/BIGlobal
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/ , info:eu-repo/semantics/OpenAccess
Mots-clés
Multiproduct firms firm capabilities vertical input linkages comparative advantage economies of scope size-based policies F - International Economics/F.F1 - Trade/F.F1.F11 - Neoclassical Models of Trade L - Industrial Organization/L.L2 - Firm Objectives, Organization, and Behavior/L.L2.L25 - Firm Performance: Size, Diversification, and Scope M - Business Administration and Business Economics • Marketing • Accounting • Personnel Economics/M.M2 - Business Economics O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth/O.O3 - Innovation • Research and Development • Technological Change • Intellectual Property RightsSujets proches
Businesses Firms Companies Enterprises Business organizations Organizations, BusinessCiter ce document
Johannes Boehm et al., « The Comparative Advantage of Firms », Archive ouverte de Sciences Po (SPIRE), ID : 10.1086/720630
Métriques
Partage / Export
Résumé
Resource-based theories propose that firms grow by diversifying into products that use common capabilities. We provide evidence for common-input capabilities, using a policy that removed entry barriers in input markets to show that the similarity of a firm’s and an industry’s input mix determines firm production choices. We model industry choice and economies of scope from input capabilities. When the model is estimated for Indian manufacturing, input complementarities make firms 5% more likely to produce in an industry and are quantitatively as important as time-invariant drivers of coproduction rates. Upstream entry barriers were equivalent to a 9.5% tariff on inputs.