Fiche du document
21 août 2014
- handle: 10670/1.wms36y
- Harnad, Stevan (2014). « Crowd-Sourced Peer Review: Substitute or supplement for the current outdated system? ». LSE Impact Blog, 8(21).
Ce document est lié à :
http://archipel.uqam.ca/6319/
Ce document est lié à :
http://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2014 [...]
Mots-clés
Open access institutional repository mandate publishingSujets proches
Peer rating Review, Peer Peer evaluationCiter ce document
Stevan Harnad, « Crowd-Sourced Peer Review: Substitute or supplement for the current outdated system? », UQAM Archipel : articles scientifiques, ID : 10670/1.wms36y
Métriques
Partage / Export
Résumé
The problem with peer review today is that there is so much research being produced that there are not enough experts with enough time to peer-review it all. As we look to address this problem, issues of standards and hierarchy remain unsolved. Stevan Harnad wonders whether crowd-sourced peer review could match, exceed, or come close to the benchmark of the current system. He predicts crowdsourcing will indeed be able to provide a supplement to the classical system, hopefully improving efficiency and accuracy, but not a substitute for it.