Ways in which engaging in someone else's reasoning is productive

Fiche du document

Date

31 mars 2016

Discipline
Type de document
Périmètre
Langue
Identifiants
Collection

Archives ouvertes

Licence

info:eu-repo/semantics/OpenAccess



Sujets proches En

Argumentation Ratiocination

Citer ce document

Chris Rasmussen et al., « Ways in which engaging in someone else's reasoning is productive », HAL-SHS : sciences de l'éducation, ID : 10670/1.xy3ram


Métriques


Partage / Export

Résumé En

Typical goals for inquiry-oriented mathematics classrooms are for students to explain their reasoning and to make sense of others' reasoning. In this paper we offer a framework for interpreting ways in which engaging in the reasoning of someone else is productive for the person who is listening. The framework, which captures the relationship between engaging with another's reasoning, decentering, elaborating justifications, and refining/enriching conceptions, is the result of analysis of 10 individual problem-solving interviews with 10 mathematics education graduate students enrolled in a mathematics content course on chaos and fractals. The theoretical grounding for this work is that of the emergent perspective (Cobb & Yackel, 1996).

document thumbnail

Par les mêmes auteurs

Sur les mêmes sujets

Sur les mêmes disciplines

Exporter en