Fiche du document
2012
- handle: 10670/1.y1svqa
- halshs: halshs-00711519
- doi: 10.2383/36889
Ce document est lié à :
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.2383/36889
Mots-clés
social protection welfare reform activation flexicurity K - Law and Economics/K.K3 - Other Substantive Areas of Law/K.K3.K31 - Labor LawSujets proches
Examples Exemplars 1980s Eighties (Twentieth century decade) 80s (Twentieth century decade) Hours (Time) Public welfare--Government policy Welfare (Public assistance) Social welfare Poor relief Public welfare reform Relief (Aid) Welfare reform Public assistance Benevolent institutions Public relief Public charities Legislative acts Legislative enactments Acts, Legislative Enactments, Legislative Laws (Statutes) Employment law Labor standards (Labor law) Labor law Employees--Legal status, laws, etc Working class--Legal status, laws, etc Work--Law and legislation Industrial relations--Law and legislation Investing Investment management Portfolio Funds Funding Finance, commerce, confiscations, etcCiter ce document
Jean-Claude Barbier, « Comment on Anton Hemerijck. Social investment, a problematic concept with an ambiguous past », HAL-SHS : sociologie, ID : 10.2383/36889
Métriques
Partage / Export
Résumé
Anton Hemerijck has written a warm plea in favour of social investment policies. Highly politicized, the concept is ambiguous and has existed under different guises for a long time, since its first avatar "enabling state" in the late 1980s. It is very risky to distinguish between social protection expenditure according to whether they are investments or not. The failed policies of "flexicurity" and "activation" that are supposed to illustrate social investment at its best, are good examples of this ambiguity.