Physics in the Broad Sense. Boyle, Newton, and the Baconian Metaphysical Physics

Fiche du document

Date

2018

Discipline
Périmètre
Langue
Identifiants
Collection

Archives ouvertes

Licence

info:eu-repo/semantics/OpenAccess



Citer ce document

Philippe Hamou, « Physics in the Broad Sense. Boyle, Newton, and the Baconian Metaphysical Physics », HAL-SHS : philosophie, ID : 10670/1.yhrq3c


Métriques


Partage / Export

Résumé En

Although Boyle’s and Newton’s conceptions of the relation between physics and metaphysics can be considered as critical responses to Descartes, this chapter shows that these responses should not be interpreted in the positivist guise that was long prevalent in the standard account of British science. What makes the positions of Newton, Boyle, and other “experimental philosophers” distinctive is not so much a straight rejection of what Daniel Garber has labeled Descartes’ metaphysical physics, but rather another conception of it, partly grounded in the Baconian understanding of the architecture of natural knowledge. This conception allows physics, in an enlarged sense of the word, to include the metaphysical consideration of primary and final causes, as well as forms and essences.

document thumbnail

Par les mêmes auteurs

Sur les mêmes sujets

Sur les mêmes disciplines

Exporter en