Fiche du document
- handle: 10670/1.z1hvw8
- hal: hal-00850488
- doi: 10.1076/jmep.26.3.285.3022
- PUBMED: 11445883
Ce document est lié à :
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1076/jmep.26.3.285.3022
Ce document est lié à :
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/pmid/11445883
info:eu-repo/semantics/OpenAccess
Mots-clés
MESH: Attitude to Health MESH: Interviews as Topic MESH: Humans MESH: Informed Consent MESH: Researcher-Subject Relations MESH: Anecdotes as Topic MESH: Clinical Trials as Topic MESH: Data Collection MESH: France MESH: Government Regulation MESH: History, 20th Century MESH: Human Experimentation -bio]/Santé publique et épidémiologieSujets proches
Legislative committees Frontier troubles Anecdotes, facetiae, satire, etc Biomedical research Biological research 20th century 1900s (Century) Nineteen hundreds (Century) Godfathers Godmothers Natural science Sciences Science of science Scientific research Science research Science--Research Service of process Service of papers Abuse of process Process Political thought Government Political theory Civil government Commonwealth, The Science, Political Administration Politics Negotiations Bargaining Haggling Negotiating Higgling Dickering Experimental medicine Biomedical research Medical research People Man Humanity (Human beings) Human race Mankind Homo sapiens Humankind Humans Annals Wellness Personal health Cultural sociology Culture--Social aspects Sociology of culture Controlled clinical trials Randomized clinical trials Trials, Clinical Patient trials of new treatments Facetiae Ana Humor Skill Abilities Talent Aptitude Talents Proficiency Skills Relations--Foreign countries Relations (Canon law) Biography--HealthCiter ce document
P. Amiel et al., « Acculturating human experimentation: an empirical survey in France », HAL-SHS : sociologie, ID : 10.1076/jmep.26.3.285.3022
Métriques
Partage / Export
Résumé
Preliminary results of an empirical study of human experimentation practices are presented and contrasted with those of a survey conducted a hundred years ago when clinical research, although tolerated, was culturally deviant. Now that biomedical research is both authorized and controlled, its actors (sponsors, committees, investigators, subjects) come out with heterogeneous rationalities, and they appear to be engaged in a transactional process of negotiating their rationales with one another. In the European context "protective" of subjects, surprisingly the subjects we interviewed (and especially patient-subjects) were creative and revealed an aptitude for integrating experimental medicine into common culture.