Individual Behavior under Evaluative Voting. A comparison between laboratory and In Situ experiments

Metadatas

Date

2016

Language
Identifiers
Relations

This document is linked to :
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1007/978-3-319-40573-5_13

Collection

Archives ouvertes



Similar subjects En

Polls

Cite this document

Antoinette Baujard et al., « Individual Behavior under Evaluative Voting. A comparison between laboratory and In Situ experiments », HAL-SHS : économie et finance, ID : 10.1007/978-3-319-40573-5_13


Metrics


Share / Export

Abstract En

This chapter compares two experimental methodologies for studying how individual voting behavior changes with respect to the choice of voting rule. We concentrate on different versions of Evaluative Voting. The results are based on two types of experimental protocol: a classical laboratory experiment with monetarily-induced preferences, and an in situ experiment run in parallel with the 2012 French presidential election. In the laboratory, individuals use the different rating scales in similar ways; but this is not the case in situ. The difference may be due to the different ways subjects interpret the proposed scales (in particular negative grades) when they concern real candidates. Finally, the chapter discusses what each method can teach us about voter behavior. Notably, we highlight behavior that is in contradiction with the tenets of strict rationality. This phenomenon, which is very widely observed in situ, and where it may be explained by a motive to express oneself, is also observed in the lab, where it is still to be explained.

document thumbnail

From the same authors

On the same subjects

Within the same disciplines

Export in