Are Emotions Valueceptions or Responses to Values? Husserl’s Phenomenology of Affectivity Reconsidered

Fiche du document

Date

27 février 2023

Type de document
Périmètre
Langue
Identifiant
Relations

Ce document est lié à :
info:eu-repo/semantics/reference/issn/2280-7853

Ce document est lié à :
info:eu-repo/semantics/reference/issn/2239-4028

Organisation

OpenEdition

Licences

https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ , info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess




Citer ce document

Alexis Delamare, « Are Emotions Valueceptions or Responses to Values? Husserl’s Phenomenology of Affectivity Reconsidered », Phenomenology and Mind, ID : 10670/1.zms7u5


Métriques


Partage / Export

Résumé 0

How are we able to experience values? Two sides are competing in contemporary literature: ‘Meinongians’ (represented notably by Christine Tappolet) claim that axiological properties are apprehended in emotions, while ‘Hildebrandians’ (represented in particular by Ingrid Vendrell Ferran) assert that such experiences of value (or valueceptions) are accomplished in special ‘value feelings’, and that emotions are only responses to these felt values. In this paper, I study the Husserlian viewpoint on this issue. I reveal that, contrary to what almost all scholars have assumed so far, Husserl’s position is not reducible to Meinong’s and must on the contrary be regarded as an innovative and stimulating approach that helps unifying the two standard frameworks. It indeed recognizes (with Hildebrandians) the existence of non-emotional value feelings, while maintaining (with Meinongians) that originary axiological experiences are necessarily emotional.

document thumbnail

Par les mêmes auteurs

Sur les mêmes sujets

Exporter en