Debunking some myths about the role and relevance of (restricted) semantic role sets: Some thoughts on Ágel & Höllein 2021
Fiche du document
2022
- 20.500.13089/6li3
Ce document est lié à :
https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.13089/6m3g
Ce document est lié à :
https://doi.org/10.4000/books.pusl
Ce document est lié à :
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/isbn/978-2-8028-0262-4
Ce document est lié à :
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/isbn/978-2-8028-0260-0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess , https://www.openedition.org/12554
Sujets proches
Semeiotics Signs Symbolic representation Symbols Representation, Symbolic Signs Signage Guide signs Sign-boards Signs and sign-boards Guide-posts Guideposts Signs (Advertising) SignboardsCiter ce document
Hans C. Boas et al., « Debunking some myths about the role and relevance of (restricted) semantic role sets: Some thoughts on Ágel & Höllein 2021 », Presses universitaires Saint-Louis Bruxelles
Partage / Export
Résumé
1. IntroductionThis paper discusses Ágel and Höllein’s (2021) proposals regarding the status of semantic roles as well as their relevance for the syntax-semantics interface in German. On their view, a specific restricted list of semantic roles can be used to model the meaning side of complex linguistic signs, so-called “Satzbauplanzeichen” (‘clause pattern signs’, lit. ‘signs of sentence-building plans’, a type of complex linguistic sign), which are assumed to be completely abstract signs that...
