Observability, Dominance, and Induction in Learning Models

Fiche du document

Date

3 janvier 2022

Type de document
Périmètre
Identifiants
Collection

arXiv

Organisation

Cornell University




Citer ce document

Daniel Clark et al., « Observability, Dominance, and Induction in Learning Models », arXiv - économie, ID : 10.1016/j.jet.2022.105569


Métriques


Partage / Export

Résumé 0

Learning models do not in general imply that weakly dominated strategies are irrelevant or justify the related concept of "forward induction," because rational agents may use dominated strategies as experiments to learn how opponents play, and may not have enough data to rule out a strategy that opponents never use. Learning models also do not support the idea that the selected equilibria should only depend on a game's normal form, even though two games with the same normal form present players with the same decision problems given fixed beliefs about how others play. However, playing the extensive form of a game is equivalent to playing the normal form augmented with the appropriate terminal node partitions so that two games are information equivalent, i.e., the players receive the same feedback about others' strategies.

document thumbnail

Par les mêmes auteurs

Sur les mêmes sujets

Sur les mêmes disciplines

Exporter en