J.J. Meerpohl

Discipline

Psychologie (1) Sciences de l'information et de la communication (1)

Type de document

Articles (15) Recensions (1)

Co-auteur

Date

Source

Mot-clé

recherche (13) Research (13) Research (13) protocole (8) procès (8) Discrimination (8) Publications (8) cohorte (8) littérature (7) Reporting (7) Will (7) Research--Moral and ethical aspects (7) Literature (7) Will (7) information (6) Reviews (6) Information resources--Reviews (6) Reference sources--Reviews (6) Theater--Reviews (6) Television programs--Reviews (6) Newspapers--Sections, columns, etc.--Reviews (6) Human beings (6) Discussion (6) Books--Reviews (6) projet (5) analyse (5) effet (5) Committees (5) Trials (5) Meta-analysis (5)

Documents écrit par J.J. Meerpohl (15) | parle de J.J. Meerpohl (0)

Attitudes of editors of core clinical journals about whether systematic reviews are original research: a mixed-methods study.
J.J. Meerpohl et al. (30 août 2019)
Systematic review finds that study data not published in full text articles have unclear impact on meta-analyses results in medical research.
C.M. Schmucker et al. (2017)
Guidance in author instructions of hematology and oncology journals: A cross sectional and longitudinal study.
I. Toews et al. (2017)
Bias in dissemination of clinical research findings: structured OPEN framework of what, who and why, based on literature review and expert consensus.
D. Bassler et al. (2016)
Agreements between Industry and Academia on Publication Rights: A Retrospective Study of Protocols and Publications of Randomized Clinical Trials.
B. Kasenda et al. (2016)
Planning and reporting of quality-of-life outcomes in cancer trials.
S. Schandelmaier et al. (2015)
Fate of clinical research studies after ethical approval--follow-up of study protocols until publication.
A. Blümle et al. (2014)
Subgroup analyses in randomised controlled trials: cohort study on trial protocols and journal publications
B. Kasenda et al. (2014)
Extent of non-publication in cohorts of studies approved by research ethics committees or included in trial registries
C. Schmucker et al. (2014)
Prevalence, characteristics, and publication of discontinued randomized trials.
B. Kasenda et al. (2014)
Defining publication bias: protocol for a systematic review of highly cited articles and proposal for a new framework.
K.F. Müller et al. (2013)
Publication bias in animal research: a systematic review protocol.
M. Briel et al. (2013)
A protocol for a systematic review on the impact of unpublished studies and studies published in the gray literature in meta-analyses.
C. Schmucker et al. (2013)
Detecting, quantifying and adjusting for publication bias in meta-analyses: protocol of a systematic review on methods.
K.F. Mueller et al. (2013)
Protocol for a systematic review on the extent of non-publication of research studies and associated study characteristics.
S. Portalupi et al. (2013)