"Too complex for me!" Why do performance-approach and performance-avoidance goals predict exam performance?
Fiche du document
2009
- handle: 10670/1.2n1c6c
Ce document est lié à :
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/pissn/0256-2928
Ce document est lié à :
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/urn/urn:nbn:ch:serval-BIB_9611942012DE7
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess , Copying allowed only for non-profit organizations , https://serval.unil.ch/disclaimer
Sujets proches
CompetenceCiter ce document
C. Darnon et al., « "Too complex for me!" Why do performance-approach and performance-avoidance goals predict exam performance? », Serveur académique Lausannois, ID : 10670/1.2n1c6c
Métriques
Partage / Export
Résumé
Classroom research on achievement goals has revealed that performance-approach goals (goals to outperform others) positively predict exam performance whereas performance-avoidance goals (goals not to perform more poorly than others) negatively predict it. Because prior classroom research has primarily utilized multiplechoice exam performance, the first aim of the present study was to extend these findings to a different measure of exam performance (oral examination). The second aim of this research was to test the mediating role of perceived difficulty. Participants were 49 4th year psychology students of the University of Geneva. Participants answered a questionnaire assessing their level of performance-approach and performance-avoidance goal endorsement in one of their classes as well as the perceived difficulty of this class for themselves. Results indicated that performance-approach goals significantly and positively predicted exam grades. Performance-avoidance goals significantly and negatively predicted grades. Both of these relationships were mediated by the perceived difficulty of the class for oneself. Thus, the links previously observed between performance goals and exam performance were replicated on an oral exam. Perceived difficulty is discussed as a key dimension responsible for these findings.